For the most part they find that degrading as well as the choking, hair pulling and general rough stuff.įrom reading various posts and threads in this forum, it would appear that many disdain the scene in which after several minutes of varied sex play, the maler and female performer and actress quickly pull away and she gets on her knees while he struggles for several minutes to plant a cum shot on her face. female audience) are not really into that. Even in the old days and even occasionally (due to a variety of reasons and problems with performers and production crew) some cum shots were even faked.Īside from the old reasons for showing "cum shots" (to signal end of scene, and that you were seeing the "real thing") the new antics involving "cum swallowing" and "cum swapping", "bukkake" have pushed the envelope and boundaries and a lot of women (i.e. It would probably have required cuts/edits and longer scenes (movies were invrariably about 80-90 minutes long max) people would suspect they were faked. You could not not really show it (internal shots) properly with the poor production budget and equipment they used. The internal cum shots, for obvious reasons, were not depicted in porn movies until recently. In the old days the cum shots pretty much landed on the girl's ass, stomach, chest and only rarely and occasionaly on the face. The basic reason was to signal the end of a scene and to show that the performers were not faking it. They all feel good, but I'd like to do the external shot more often, but that is more dependent on how I think she is feeling at the moment.Ĭlick to expandNica, it goes back to the way porn movies were produced (which means targeted for a male audience). But I do sometimes cum on her tits or belly or ass. In my own personal experience, I mostly cum inside my wife, as I'm sure most of us do. I don't like creampies for the most part. More ass splattered shots, cum on the pussy (though I believe a lot of porn girls don't like this), belly shots, tit shots. But what I wish there was more of in porn was a greater variety of cumshots. It's not good enough to say you did, show us you did.Īlso, taking a cum shot seems to validate that the girl is really into the sex.
#POPSHOT PORN MOVIE#
But for us guys, we tend to be skeptical, and think to ourselves that oh yeah, this is just a movie & he didn't really cum at all. facial expressions, verbal cues, and the stoppage of sex, that seems to be enough for the female audience to draw arousal from. For example, if you've ever seen a hotel porno (soft core), where the guy "cums" inside the woman at the end, and all you see are clues to this, i.e. So seeing that blast of cum enhances the experience of watching porn for most of us guys.Īnd if you want to talk about the difference between the sexes, men & women tend to interpret information differently. Remember, guys are visually stimulated, and the cumshot is the ultimate act of fucking. Little did that borderline-ugly sloppy-titted slit know she just made porn history.I very much prefer to see the guy cum on the girl rather than in her. "Omygod," he says, "what the fuck kind of vitamins-?" The camera cuts to Peter North's cock and Misty's completely blasted, bewildered face. Mid-blast she can't believe what's happening. Why is he so adept at blasting homely faces? e.g., the unbelievable blast he unleashes all over Misty Parks' stupid and stupefied face. Falco Zita's blast is mediocre but Peter North more than makes up for it. I'd say Julie's the ultimate butter face but her butt-ugly mug distracts from her slender body and lovely tits.
13 cocks blast Missy Monroe's fetching, depraved face and she and Kama Andrews get to lick the blast off Missy's face. This fishlipped Long Beach bitch shot 467 scenes and as far as this unprofessional pervert can tell this is easily her best. Julie Night is one of the ugliest, stupidest-looking sluts in the history of porn.
0 kommentar(er)
